Goal. Let students feel the best response logic before we formalise it.
Use best responses and have students play against a mixed strategy. Before revealing how the opponent plays, ask each pair to guess the opponent's mix and to commit to a response. Then play against the actual mixed strategy:
>>> import random
>>> random.seed(0) # Don't seed in class
>>> ["r_2", "r_1"][random.random() < 0.8] # 80 percent chance of r_2
'r_2'
Compare the responses students committed to with the best response to the revealed mix.
Discuss the Rationalisation chapter.
Discussion Point: After the definition of dominance, ask why dominance is not relevant to the game we played.
Discussion Point: How does the best response condition apply to the matching pennies game we played in class?
This activity feeds into the Nash equilibrium material. Use Question 1 (the in-class activity) on the Nash Equilibrium page to show students how the ideas here become a full-mark exam answer.
General email templates to send before and after this class. Fill in the bracketed placeholders before sending.
Hi all,
A reminder that our next Game Theory class covers Rationalisation.
All of the course materials, including the relevant chapter, are available
at https://vknight.org/gt/. It is worth skimming the chapter beforehand.
See you in class,
Vince
Dear all,
Thanks for your work in today's class on Rationalisation.
A recording is available here [RECORDING LINK] and on Learning Central.
All class resources are available at https://vknight.org/gt/.
Thanks,
Vince