Writing review of example

In class today we look at the example paper as well as the marking criteria. Marking the paper alone is not a good exercise as the entire project also requires the presentation which we will look at next week.

You can find a recording of the class here.

Below is a summary of my recollection of our conversation:

• The paper should:
  • Say what you have done.
  • Say how you did it.
  • Say what you found.
  • Say why (answer “so what?”).
• We spoke about whether or not to use visualisation in a paper. Without this being a rule I’d suggest it is a good idea when appropriate.
• We spoke about the need to include reference (in the 2 pages).
• We spoke about code and where to include it.
• We spoke about levels of depth (and how specifically the example paper had little depth).

I asked you as a class to mark the project, based on the paper alone: you came to an average of about 61/100.

I threw it in to Chat GPT and it gave it a mark of 52/100.

We will come to the mark that I feel it warrants but only after discussing the presentation.